Teen Takeover: What's The Incentive For Obeying The Rules?

Over the Summer of 2023, stories of “teen takeover” were hard to ignore. Specifically, gatherings--orchestrated via social media and involving acts such as blocking traffic--resulted in over 40 arrests in Chicago. Similar events happened in NYC and Philadelphia in August and September, respectively. But what’s the solution?

Officer Fred Waller posits “try to offer other things for them to do and other avenues.” (Cauguiran) But I ask: like what? Ultimately, the status quo will only allow a few to win, per se. This is regardless of individual aspiration, compliance, etc. In other words, abiding by societal rules doesn't equate to a more abundant life for some people.

Further, as exemplified by the “Downtown Posse” of Dayton, OH, this trend isn’t new and is indicative of the flaws of neoliberalism (ie, Western Capitalism). The Bush administration put emphasis on higher education. Yet, even when education is factored in, African Americans still lose. This assertion is highlighted in a couple of articles at americanprogress.org, with one stating “even among college graduates, African Americans often face greater job instability and higher unemployment rates” (Weller).

Additionally, President Obama stressed the importance of STEM as a gateway to a better life. Yet, I got a CompSci degree but still find it hard to stay employed: I’m sure other minorities can relate to this, especially males. Given such a bleak outcome, it’s no wonder teen takeovers (mostly consisting of black teens) occur: why play a game you’ll inevitably lose?

Although no one, myself included, desires property damage, looting, etc., vague solutions or even specific ones based on education aren’t realistic. In short, old neoliberal sayings like hard work pays off, and you get what you give are increasingly false in America: as my research implies, pre-determined attributes such as race/ethnicity, sex, etc. trump respectability politics.

Thanks for reading and stay pissed.

Comments